The Israeli – Palestine War

 


The last period has seen some new activity, not necessarily for the better. Now there is threatened an escalation between the two main protagonists, Israel and Iran. Going back about 3 weeks, Israel was at a pause point, brought about by its targeting aid trucks and openly killing 7 aid workers, including 3 British acting for protection and 1 American. This brought a storm of protest from western allies, and Israel was advised very strongly not to pursue its plans to attack Rafah in an attempt to clear out the thugs of Hamas. This action would not receive whole-hearted backing. 

PM Benjamin Netanyahu faced a quandary. The US and western allies sent a forceful message that they would not condone a heavy-handed entry into Rafah with many civilian casualties as witnessed in previous actions in Gaza. Israel was losing the high moral ground. To regain this they had to provoke the opposition, led by Iran, to take some action against Israel which would concern the west. Consequently, they took a limited action strike on an Iranian consular outpost in Syria, killing a handful of people, including two senior members of the Republican Guards. Naturally, this invoked a serious response, the consulate perceived as Iranian land, as any such diplomatic posts are. As witnessed last weekend, 13 April, over 300 missiles and drones were fired at Israel. Fortunately, nearly all were taken down by Israel’s air defensive shield along with US and UK planes put into service. This was condemned by the west, fearing an escalation, but the west has made little mention of the earlier Israeli provocation that led to the Iranian action.

The US and the west have advised Israel strongly to de-escalate the situation and take the ‘success’ of last weekend, drawing a line under the tit-for-tat. The British and German foreign secretaries met with the Israeli cabinet and put this point, but acknowledged that Israel always had a right to defend itself, puzzlingly not referring to the earlier provocation. However, the Israelis are not listening. PM Netanyahu feels he has regained the high moral ground, his allies are once again backing him, and he has rejected the advice. He has tried a modest 3-prong probe including on the nuclear facility of Isfahan, no harm done. He wanted to show that Israel would retaliate despite having started the recent exchange. The west should be worried, a potential escalation could be looming. 

PM Netanyahu feels that he can once more proceed with his war aim to destroy Hamas and risk Iranian led bombardments on Israel and escalation of the Middle East tension. Consequently, the Israelis have started to step up their aerial attacks on Rafah, killing several innocent children playing around the rubble. It appears that they are gearing up to carry out a full-scale invasion of Rafah, the aim to finally eliminate the Hamas thugs. The hostages taken on 7 October, those left alive from the brutal and abusive conditions in which they are held, are apparently a secondary consideration. 

One has to go back two decades or more in which PM Netanyahu has held some power, and influenced the Israeli political thinking towards the Palestinians, his long-time disdain for all Arabs, particularly since Hamas took power in 2006 in Gaza. In no way would he tolerate a 2-state solution as the west are backing and as indicated would be the outcome following the division of the land called Palestine in 1948, the initial intent. He sees this as the best chance, with a vacillating American government, which he has learned to ‘play’, despite considerable unpopularity at home, to put Israel in charge of the total land area of 1948 Palestine. The Palestinians will either leave or put up with a secondary role, apartheid.

In the meantime, while eyes are turned to overseas or to Rafah, the right- wing settlers are pushing the Palestinians back, burning homes and destroying livelihoods in the West Bank. The police and soldiers, who are supposed to be keeping the peace, are standing by and watching. Unforgiveable! One cannot understand that this is permitted to happen. 

Meanwhile, we watch this shameful position continue, the arming of Israel and the weakness of the west to have their say. Enemies are watching! The only good thing of the last few days is the approval by Congress in the US to send arms to Ukraine, although it must be followed up by granting membership of NATO. That is another story.

Dr J Scott Younger


About the author: 
Dr J Scott Younger, OBE, is a professional civil engineer; he spent 42 years in the Far East undertaking assignments in 10 countries for WB, ADB, UNDP.  He published many papers; he was a columnist for Forbes Indonesia and Globe Asia. He served on British & European Chamber boards and was a Vice Chair of Int’l Business Chamber for 17 years. His expertise is infrastructure and sustainable development and he takes an interest in international affairs. He is an International Chancellor of the President University, Indonesia and Honorary Senior Research Fellow of the Glasgow University. He is a member of IFIMES Advisory Board. Lived and worked in Thailand from 1978 to 1983 and visited Burma, Bangladesh and Nepal for projects.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect IFIMES official position.

Ljubljana/Glasgow, May 2024

Foootnotes:
[1] IFIMES – International Institute for Middle East and Balkan Studies, based in Ljubljana, Slovenia, has Special Consultative status at ECOSOC/UN since 2018 and is the publisher of the international scientific journal “European Perspectives”. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
IFIMES – International Institute for Middle East and Balkan Studies


Ubicazione: Lubiana, Slovenia

Commenti

Posta un commento

Post popolari in questo blog

The War in Ukraine as an inevitable manifestation of globalism vs. nationalism

Immagine
  A fter two years and four months since its outbreak, the War in Ukraine has turned out to be arguably the most significant event in contemporary international relations. Although its warfare is limited to the geographic areas centered on eastern and southeastern parts of the country, the War has involved global political and economic confrontation between Russia and the U.S.-led West. Evidently, with the BRICS and major Global South countries having taken non-U.S., if not anti-U.S., stances, the War is rapidly transforming the already severely declined U.S. hegemony into an embryonic multipolar world order . It is now of great importance to comprehend the essential nature of the War from a macro-historical perspective on modern and contemporary international relations. Such an approach will likely enable going beyond conventional current event commentary, policy analysis, and regular IR/comparative analysis. This study is particularly interested in the Jewish question as a va...
Continua a leggere

Russia preoccupata per la rivolta in Abcasia: il presidente Aslan Bzhania in fuga dalla capitale Sukhum dichiara di non volersi dimettere

Immagine
  Il presidente dell'Abcasia Aslan Bzhania Il presidente abcaso Alsan Bzhania ha lasciato venerdì la capitale della repubblica, Sukhum , respingendo la richiesta dell'opposizione di dimettersi e indire elezioni anticipate. L'opposizione in Abcasia ha interrotto i colloqui con i funzionari governativi e ha annunciato l'intenzione di rafforzare le proprie forze nel distretto governativo sequestrato. Secondo i primi resoconti, il presidente ha ritirato dal parlamento un disegno di legge per ratificare un accordo di investimento con la Russia, criticato dall'opposizione. Tuttavia, il suo servizio stampa ha smentito questa informazione sabato mattina. La posizione del Presidente - Rivolgendosi ai suoi sostenitori sullo sfondo dei disordini che hanno colpito il distretto governativo nella capitale Sukhum , il presidente abkhazo Aslan Bzhania ha rifiutato di dimettersi. "Resto in Abcasia e continuerò a lavorare", ha affermato. - Al momento, Bzhania si trova ne...
Continua a leggere

Geopolitics of the COP 29 Summit, in Baku

Immagine
Climate change has become one of the most pressing issues in global governance, shaping both the domestic policies of states and their international relations. Its multifaceted impacts transcend environmental degradation, influencing economic stability, political systems, migration patterns, and even military security.   Climate change requires an even deeper analyze from the perspective of its geopolitical importance . The upcoming COP 29 Conference in Baku, November 2024 , will be highly significant, especially in the context of how climate change is shaping geopolitical relations and regional stability. Azerbaijan’s role as host presents a unique opportunity for the country to influence global climate diplomacy, particularly because of its position at the crossroads of Europe , Asia , and the Middle Eas t, and as a key player in the energy market. Ambassador  Arben Cici   -  Professor of International Relations  Mediterranean University of Albania 1.  ...
Continua a leggere